Read the review he did love the game and it came down to running into a bug that made his save corrupt losing playthroughs. Yeah dan Stapleton is a f**king hack and this is a ridiculous score. But what you're basically saying is that the reviewer is basically lying about his experience just because you didn't have any problems.ĭark_Knightmare2 1891d ago (Edited 1891d ago ) Developers would be pretty quick to respond to a reviewer over an issue preventing them from playing it. Why do you have to bring PS into every discussion, then proceed to disparage against the console? Given the number of games that don't have severe input lag, and the fact it was dodgy on the PC, couldn't this be indicative of the game and the developer, rather than the console? Which calls into more question why you would bring PS into the discussion, as opposed to criticizing the developer.Īt most, maybe the reviewer should have disclosed if they attempted to fix the issues they had by contacting the developer.
Why even bring PS4 into this? This was a review of the PC version.
Will he update it? probably not, because when the patches come out, who will care anymore? Smooth as butter except that it crashes and has game breaking bugs? Maybe you were one of the lucky ones, but the reviewer based his review on his experience. Rainslacker 1890d ago (Edited 1890d ago ) Again, not defending this reviewer or whatsoever, just my opinion. DF found the PC version to be running great and highly recommend it as the version all should play, but from their video, they haven't played it till the end, so they might have not stumble upon this issue in question. I'm not trying to defend anyone here though. Granted that PC have so many configurations, minor bugs are exceptable to a degree but blatant game breaking and save corrupting bugs? Shouldn't have happen in the first place because that's the bottom line IMO. They had to get out of their way and buy it like others after the game launch and this happened. They used to receive early copies, and many times yet to be patches copies of games for their review so just they can publish their review before the game launch, so maybe.just maybe.they were willing to tolerate bugs in those games, expecting them to be patched by launch. Maybe.just maybe.the reviewer is pissed that this happened to a "retail" copy of the game unlike other games they reviewed using review copies before.